Myers v. Miller-Stout
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM **
Robert W. Myers appeals the judgment of the district court denying his petition for a writ of habeas corpus. We affirm. Because the parties are familiar with the history of this case, we will not recount it here.
Myers argues that the Sentencing Review Board of the State of Washington (“Board”) violated his constitutional rights when a portion of his parole revocation proceedings was conducted in his absence. The proceeding in question was an informal, pre-hearing conference led by a facilitator at which procedural issues, such as discovery and scheduling, were discussed. Because…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Morrissey v. BrewerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Lindh v. MurphySupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Kentucky v. StincerSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Overton v. BazzettaSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
- Black v. RomanoSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Myers v. Miller-Stout, Superintendent, Airway Heights Corrections CenterSupreme Court of the United States · 2005