Legal Opinion

Myers v. Miller-Stout

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided December 8, 2004No. 03-35648PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM **

Robert W. Myers appeals the judgment of the district court denying his petition for a writ of habeas corpus. We affirm. Because the parties are familiar with the history of this case, we will not recount it here.

Myers argues that the Sentencing Review Board of the State of Washington (“Board”) violated his constitutional rights when a portion of his parole revocation proceedings was conducted in his absence. The proceeding in question was an informal, pre-hearing conference led by a facilitator at which procedural issues, such as discovery and scheduling, were discussed. Because…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Morrissey v. BrewerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Lindh v. MurphySupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  3. Kentucky v. StincerSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  4. Overton v. BazzettaSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
  5. Black v. RomanoSupreme Court of the United States · 1985

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Myers v. Miller-Stout, Superintendent, Airway Heights Corrections CenterSupreme Court of the United States · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API