Legal Opinion

Grasselli Chemical Co. v. Biddle Purchasing Co.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 12, 1903No. Appeal, No. 217PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Appeal, No. 217, Oct. T., 1902, by defendant, from judgment of C. P. No. 4, Philadelphia County, March T, 1899, No. 49, on verdict for plaintiff in case of Grasselli Chemical Company v. Biddle Purchasing Company. Assumpsit for goods sold and delivered. Before Attdenrted, J. . At the trial it appeared that the goods were ordered bj M. W. Boley, who had been agent for the defendant. The defendant claimed that the goods were ordered after Boley’s agency had been revoked.

Read the full summary

Appeal, No. 217, Oct. T., 1902, by defendant, from judgment of C. P. No. 4, Philadelphia County, March T, 1899, No. 49, on verdict for plaintiff in case of Grasselli Chemical Company v. Biddle Purchasing Company. Assumpsit for goods sold and delivered. Before Attdenrted, J. . At the trial it appeared that the goods were ordered bj M. W. Boley, who had been agent for the defendant. The defendant claimed that the goods were ordered after Boley’s agency had been revoked. Plaintiff averred that they had received no notice of the revocation. There was evidence that the United States Wire & Nail…

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion bt

Orlady, J.,

The plaintiff delivered to the defendant certain merchandise which the appellant admits was ordered by the person who had been the defendant’s authorized representative in former deah ings between the parties, and that no formal notice had been given to the plaintiff of the termination of that authority.

“ The rule so vigorously contended for by the appellant, that those dealing with an agent are bound to look to his authority, is freely conceded, but this case falls within the equally established rule that those clothing an agent with apparent authority, are, as to…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Brooke v. New York, Lake Erie, & Western R. R.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1885
  2. Commonwealth v. KaySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1900
  3. Adams Express Co. v. SchlessingerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1874
  4. Knapp v. GriffinSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1891
  5. Robb v. Pennsylvania Co. for Insurance on Lives & Granting AnnuitiesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1898

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Mynick v. BickingsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1906
  2. Einfeld v. ShermerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1914
  3. Fay v. DeadySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1923
  4. Bellman v. Pittsburg & Allegheny Valley Railway Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1906
  5. Stankiewicz v. Heights Construction & Supply Co., Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Schuylkill County1929

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API