Legal Opinion
Union Investment Co. v. Fidelity & Deposit Co.
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided February 23, 1977No. 76-1027PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PHILLIPS, Chief Judge.
The question presented on this appeal is whether forged Federal Housing Administration Certificates of Mortgage Insurance were covered by a blanket bond issued by Fidelity and Deposit Company of Maryland (Fidelity), the defendant-appellant. Union Investment Company (Union), the plaintiffappellee, through a wholly owned subsidiary, relied upon the forged certificates in advancing mortgage money. In an opinion reported at 400 F.Supp. 860 (E.D.Mich. 1975), District Judge Charles W. Joiner held *1109that the certificates were “securities, documents or other written instruments,”…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Nickerson v. Citizens Mutual InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1975
- Gorham v. Peerless Life InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1962
- Sobczak v. KotwickiMichigan Supreme Court · 1956
- American Insurance Company v. First National Bank in St. LouisCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1969
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Union Investment Company v. Fidelity & Deposit Company Of MarylandCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1977
- Cincinnati Gas & Electric Company v. Federal Energy Regulatory CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1984
- Cincinnati Gas & Electric Co. v. Federal Energy CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1984
- First National Bank v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1980