Legal Opinion

Tee-Hit-Ton Indians v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided July 12, 1955No. 610-53PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMadden, Judge

The plaintiff’s petition alleges that it is a clan or group of American Indians which has, from time immemorial used, occupied, and claimed a large area of land in Alaska, including some 350 square miles of water, the water area being all waters between Prince of Wales Island and Zarembo Island, *625and elsewhere the water extending a distance varying from two to five miles from the shore of their land; that certain named salmon fishing waters have been seriously impaired by the Government in that it has, by its actions purporting to protect commercial fisheries, taken the plaintiff’s run of…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Shively v. BowlbySupreme Court of the United States · 1894
  2. Tee-Hit-Ton Indians v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1955
  3. Damon v. HawaiiSupreme Court of the United States · 1904
  4. Carter v. HawaiiSupreme Court of the United States · 1906
  5. Sutter v. HeckmanDistrict Court, D. Alaska · 1900

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. The Tlingit and Haida Indians of Alaska and Harry Douglas, Intervenors v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1968
  2. Tlingit & Haida Indians v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1968
  3. The Tlingit and Haida Indians of Alaska and Harry Douglas, Intervenors v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1968

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API