Legal Opinion

People v. Richardson

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided June 28, 1999No. 98SA330PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Mullarkey

The People appeal an order entered by the Boulder County District Court dismissing a charge of wiretapping prohibited, see § 18-9-303(l)(e), (2), 6 C.R.S. (1997), against defendant, Eugene Richardson. The trial court dismissed the charge because it found the statute unconstitutionally overbroad on its face relying on the decision of the trial court in People v. Shepard, 97 CR 508, Div. 2 (Dist. Ct. Douglas County, Apr. 15, 1998). The trial court also held that section 18-9-303 violates the Equal Protection Clause of the United States and Colorado Constitutions because it sets different…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. United States v. David Lee SmithCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1992
  2. People v. JeffersonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1988
  3. State v. HowardSupreme Court of Kansas · 1984
  4. People v. ShepardSupreme Court of Colorado · 1999
  5. Chandler v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1996

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. People v. StewartSupreme Court of Colorado · 2002
  2. People v. CampbellColorado Court of Appeals · 2002
  3. The PEOPLE of the State of Colorado, Petitioner/Cross-Respondent v. Wayne Robert STEWART, Respondent/Cross-Petitioner.Supreme Court of Colorado · 2002
  4. v. SlaughterColorado Court of Appeals · 2019
  5. People v. SlaughterColorado Court of Appeals · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API