Legal Opinion

Hillman v. Gray

Washington Supreme Court

Decided July 15, 1931No. 23096. Department OnePublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Main, J .

At the time this action was instituted, the plaintiff C. D. Hillman paid into the registry of the court the sum of $2,121.46, and asked the court to determine the proportionate share thereof to which each of the defendants W. H. Perry, Cecil V. Gray, and Cascade Lumber & Shingle Co., a corporation, were entitled. A hearing was had, which resulted in a judgment to the effect that Gray had no right, title or interest to any part of the fund; that Cascade Lumber & Shingle Co. was entitled to $359.80; and that the balance should go to Perry or his attorney. Prom this judgment, Gray…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Roche v. McDonaldWashington Supreme Court · 1925
  2. Long v. SmithWashington Supreme Court · 1923
  3. Kelly v. RyanWashington Supreme Court · 1894
  4. State ex rel. Pioneer Mining & Ditch Co. v. Superior CourtWashington Supreme Court · 1919
  5. Perry v. HillmanWashington Supreme Court · 1929

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Portland Ass'n of Credit Men, Inc. v. EarleyWashington Supreme Court · 1953
  2. St. Germain v. St. GermainWashington Supreme Court · 1945
  3. Ferry County Title & Escrow Co. v. Fogle's Garage, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1971
  4. Watkins v. Peterson Enterprises, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1999
  5. American Fidelity Fire Insurance v. Paste-Ups Unlimited, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1974

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API