Legal Opinion
Tyson v. Keane
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided January 13, 1998No. 96 Civ. 8044(SAS)PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
SCHEINDLIN, District Judge.
Petitioner James Tyson seeks a writ of habeas corpus challenging his Supreme Court, Bronx County conviction for rape in the first degree. Part of the evidence presented against Tyson at trial consisted of a tape recorded telephone conversation in which a person identifying himself as “Tyson”,.did not deny committing the rape when so accused by the complaining-witness. . Be-^ fore the trial began, Tyson asked the trial court for funds to hire an expert witness to verify his contention that the voice on the tape was not his. This request was denied,…
2Cases cited44 opinions
- Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Kotteakos v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Murray v. CarrierSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Brecht v. AbrahamsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Wainwright v. SykesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Moore v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2005
- James Tyson v. John P. Keane, Superintendent, Sing Sing Correctional FacilityCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1998
- Mercado v. StinsonDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1999
- Charugundla v. LasalaDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2025
- Gillette v. GreinerDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1999