Legal Opinion
United States v. Jack West
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided October 2, 1995No. 94-2223PublishedCited by 30 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MERRITT, Chief Judge.
The United States Sentencing Commission has issued “policy” statements but not “guidelines” for resentencing after a violation of conditions of parole or supervised release. Defendant, Jack West, appeals the two year sentence imposed after admitting that he violated the conditions of his supervised release. He argues that after the amendment of 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a)(4) by the Violent Crime Control & Law Enforcement Act of 1994, 1 the statute now requires that a district court sentence a supervised release violator within the sentencing range prescribed by the Sentencing…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Stinson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Burns v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- United States v. Wiley Hill, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1995
- United States v. John P. DavernCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1992
- United States v. Annette SparksCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1994
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- United States v. Rudolph A. McClellanCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1999
- United States v. Jennifer RiccardiCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2021
- United States v. Kelvin Neal JacksonCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1995
- United States v. Donald E. McClanahanCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1998
- United States v. Joseph SchwegelCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1997
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.