Tatelbaum v. Commerce Investment Co.
Court of Appeals of Maryland
1Opinion of the CourtSingley, J.
This case offers an almost classic example of the perils which are frequently the result of innovative draftsmanship. Maryland’s General Assembly adopted the Uniform Commercial Code (the U.C.C.) in 1963, to become effective on 1 February 1964. It is now found in Maryland Code (1957, 1964 Repl. Vol.) Art. 95B. Although the Commission to Study and Report on the Uniform Commercial Code had filed a report recommending that The American Law Institute draft be adopted without change, the Legislature chose to make some 20 amendments, including a complete restructuring of § 9-401(1) of the U.C.C.
The…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Stark v. Baltimore Soda Fountain Mfg. Co.District Court, D. Maryland · 1952
3Cited by5 opinions
- In Re Carmichael Enterprises, Inc.District Court, N.D. Georgia · 1971
- In Re Golf Course Builders Leasing, Inc., Debtor. John B. Jarboe, Trustee v. United Bank of Denver, ColoradoCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1985
- Mellon Bank, N.A. v. Metro Communications, Inc. (In Re Metro Communications, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1989
- Attorney's Fees of Mohr v. PowersHawaii Supreme Court · 2001
- Attorney's Fees of Mohr v. PowersHawaii Supreme Court · 2001