Legal Opinion
Joel E. Durmer v. Dr. J. O'carroll, M.D. Robert C. Barker William Fauver, Joel Durmer
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided March 30, 1993No. 92-5068PublishedCited by 750 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
STAPLETON, Circuit Judge:
This appeal arises out of the district court’s grant of summary judgment for defendants in a civil rights action brought by plaintiff Joel Durmer, an inmate in the New Jersey correctional system. Mr. Durmer claims that the defendants violated his civil rights through their deliberate indifference to his medical needs during his period of incarceration. The district court concluded that, as a matter of law, no deliberate indifference was present here and thus, summary judgment in favor of the defendants was appropriate. For the reasons outlined…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Estelle v. GambleSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- United States v. Diebold, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Polk County v. DodsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by750 opinions
- Burks v. RaemischCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2009
- Robert Spruill v. Frank Gillis Goolier, C.O. McGlaughlin M.D. Brown, P.ACourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2004
- Donald F. Greeno v. George DaleyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2005
- Renee Palakovic v. John WetzelCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2017
- Van Dyke Johnson v. Stephen Doughty, Doctor, John Cearlock, Don HinderliterCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2006
745 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.