Legal Opinion

Smith v. Detroit, Hillsdale & Southwestern Railway Co.

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided April 29, 1885PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Error to Wayne. (Chipman, J.) Assumpsit. Defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtCampbell, J.

This suit was brought against two railway companies jointly, but the Toledo & Ann Arbor Railroad Company was not served, and the Detroit, Hillsdale & Southwestern Railway Company was proceeded against alone, but as a joint debtor, and recovery was had under the rulings below for salary as general manager of both roads down to March 1, 1882, for so much of two years’ salary, at $5000 a year, as remained unpaid. The controversy was chiefly on two points, viz., whether plaintiff was employed jointly or severally, and how long he served.

The suit was brought on what is claimed to have been a…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. McEwan v. OrtmanMichigan Supreme Court · 1876
  2. Larkin v. ButterfieldMichigan Supreme Court · 1874
  3. Detroit, Hillsdale & Southwestern Railroad v. SmithMichigan Supreme Court · 1883
  4. Kelsey v. ChamberlainMichigan Supreme Court · 1881
  5. Haynes v. LedyardMichigan Supreme Court · 1880

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Wilson v. GodkinMichigan Supreme Court · 1904

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API