Legal Opinion
Commonwealth v. Flynn, Com. v. McGee
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
Decided September 25, 1939No. Appeals, 222, 243, 340, 341, and 342PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Cunningham, J.,
Joseph McGee and Bernard J. Flynn, the lessee and operator of a licensed taproom at No. 4010 Market Street, Philadelphia, were jointly charged under indictments, identical in form, except as to dates, with book-making and permitting premises occupied by them to be used for the purpose of receiving, registering and forwarding bets and wagers upon the results of horse races at certain specified racecourses, in violation of the Act of May 22, 1895, P. L. 99, 18 PS §1461.
The proceedings below resulted in the conviction of McGee of a violation of the statute on March 17,…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Commonwealth v. BeckerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1937
- Commonwealth v. WilcoxSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1933
- Commonwealth v. JonesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1924
- Commonwealth v. ThomasSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1924
- State v. RowellSupreme Court of Iowa · 1915
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Commonwealth v. ZimmermanSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1940