Legal Opinion

State v. Rowell

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided October 19, 1915PublishedCited by 16 opinions

Appeal from Cedar District Court. — Hon. W. N. Treichler, Judge. The defendant appeals from a conviction of larceny by embezzlement.

1Opinion of the CourtSalinger, J.

I. We eliminate from consideration the objection lodged against the cross-examination of the witnesses Moore and Grassfield, because no objection was interposed to their testimony.

„ „ tionV- °suffi-' ciency. The witness Moffet was asked whether he had ever heard of defendant’s “dealings with Mrs. French as a subject or question up to this time” (November, 1913). He answered that he had, but had never heard the partieu*ars- ^ was probably done by separate answer, but as the record is printed, it appears he added to this the statement that he “heard of the deal with John Smyth prior to…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Annis v. PeopleMichigan Supreme Court · 1865
  2. Basye v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1895
  3. State v. CrowSupreme Court of Missouri · 1891
  4. State v. TippetSupreme Court of Iowa · 1895
  5. State v. CarmeanSupreme Court of Iowa · 1905

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. State v. WheelockSupreme Court of Iowa · 1934
  2. State v. HobbsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1969
  3. State v. AsburySupreme Court of Iowa · 1915
  4. State v. BurrisSupreme Court of Iowa · 1922
  5. State v. SmithSupreme Court of Iowa · 1920

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API