Legal Opinion

Brown v. Greenfield Township Board

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided June 2, 1896PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Certiorari by George H. Brown to review the proceedings of the township board of Greenfield township upon plaintiff’s appeal from a decision of the highway commissioner establishing a highway across his land.

1Opinion of the CourtLong, C. J.

Proceedings were instituted before the commissioner of highways of Greenfield township to open a road 100 feet wide along the section line of certain sections in said township, the road being about 2¶- miles long. In the proceedings the plaintiff was the only one of a large number of property owners who did not dedicate his land for such purpose. In the proceedings the commissioner found the road a public necessity, and awarded the plaintiff $80 damages. Plaintiff took a general appeal *558from the decision of the commissioner to the township board, without stating any special reasons therefor.…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Prescott v. PattersonMichigan Supreme Court · 1880
  2. Brody v. Township Board of the Township of PennMichigan Supreme Court · 1875
  3. Solder v. Township BoardMichigan Supreme Court · 1887
  4. Brown v. Township Board of GreenfieldMichigan Supreme Court · 1892
  5. Burt v. Commissioners of Highways of Sumpter & Van BurenMichigan Supreme Court · 1875

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Loomis v. HartzMichigan Supreme Court · 1911
  2. Chicago, Detroit & Canada Grand Trunk Junction Railroad v. SimonsMichigan Supreme Court · 1920
  3. Campau v. Le BlancMichigan Supreme Court · 1901

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API