Legal Opinion

Brown v. Township Board of Greenfield

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided June 10, 1892PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Mandamus. Kelator applied for mandamus to compel respondent to hear proofs on his appeal from an order laying out a highway. ' The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Per curiam

A public highway was laid out across the lands of the relator. He took a general appeal from the decision of the commissioner to the township board without specifying any special reasons. The relator was ready to produce proofs before said board to show that no public necessity existed for the opening of said highway, and that the damages allowed were insufficient. The board declined to hear such proofs, for the reason that no special grounds for the appeal were stated therein.

The statute provides that such appeal shall be in writing, signed by the appellant, addressed to the township board,…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. People ex rel. Tefft v. Township BoardMichigan Supreme Court · 1878

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Brown v. Greenfield Township BoardMichigan Supreme Court · 1896

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API