Legal Opinion
United States Ex Rel. Hoey v. Duesdieker
California Court of Appeal
Decided December 1, 1931No. Docket No. 7970PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSpence, J.
This is an appeal hy defendants Joseph P. Duesdieker and Alice Duesdieker from an order denying their motion to set aside their default and the default judgment entered against them.
The complaint was filed on February 6, 1931, seeking to enjoin these defendants and others from using certain premises in violation of the National Prohibition Act (27 U. S. C. A.) and to obtain an order closing the building on the premises known as “The Chateau” for the period of one year. Summons was personally served on these defendants on February 12th and a return was filed. The default of defendants was…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Alferitz v. CahenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
- Smith v. TunsteadCalifornia Supreme Court · 1880
- Startzman v. Los Banos Cotton Gins, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1927
3Cited by11 opinions
- Wyoming Pacific Oil Co. v. PrestonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959
- Conway v. Municipal CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1980
- Conway v. Municipal CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1980
- Westinghouse Credit Corp. v. WolferCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
- Flores v. SmithCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.