Bartlesville Zinc Co. v. Prince
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Error from District Court, Washington County; R. H. Hudson, Judge. Action by Lee Prince against the Bartles-ville Zinc Company, a corporation. Judgment for plaintiff;- and defendant brings error.
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
HOOKER, C.
It is alleged here (hat the plaintiff, at the time of the accident, had been in the employ of the company for about- three months in the capacity of a common laborer, and as such laborer had never worked with or in connection with any machinery of the company’s. That the company, knowing of plaintiff’s inexperience and lack of knowledge as to the machinery, negligently and carelessly failed to caution him of the danger incident to the employment in connection with the operation of said machinery, and especially as to the danger of the rake of the company being started…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Waters-Pierce Oil Co. v. DeselmsSupreme Court of the United States · 1909
- Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry. Co. v. DuranSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
- Neeley v. Southwestern Cotton Seed Oil Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1903
- Hellan v. Supply Laundry Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1917
- Dewey Portland Cement Co. v. BluntSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Cushing Gasoline Co. v. HutchinsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
- Phillips v. ClassenSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
- Sapulpa Refining Co. v. SapulpaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1921
- Miller v. BainSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924