Legal Opinion

AmerisourceBergen Corp. v. John Does 1 & 2

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided November 8, 2013PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION BY

WECHT, J.:

John Does 1 and 2 (“Appellants”) challenge two July 11, 2012 trial court orders concerning pre-complaint discovery initiated by AmerisourceBergen Corporation (“ABC”) and Neil Herson (collectively “Appellees”). In the first order, the trial court denied Appellants’ “Emergency Petition for Disqualification of Counsel [for Appellees] and to Prohibit and Enjoin [Ap-pellees] from Commencing an Action Against [Appellants] in Pennsylvania.” In the second, the trial court granted Appel-lees’ “Petition to Compel Disclosure of [Appellants’] Identity.” We conclude that the orders as…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Virginia State Board of Pharmacy v. Virginia Citizens Consumer Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Melvin v. DoeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
  3. Geniviva v. FriskSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
  4. Dendrite Intern., Inc. v. Doe No. 3New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2001
  5. Cooper v. Frankford Health Care System, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2008

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Verloic, G. v. Doe, J.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2015
  2. O'Donnell v. KnottDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2017
  3. Big Daddy's Beer & Pizza, Inc. v. Delbalso Bros.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2017
  4. Com. v. Baylor, T.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2017
  5. Com. v. Scott, D.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2020

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API