Verloic, G. v. Doe, J.
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION BY
SHOGAN, J.:
Appellants, John and/or Jane Doe, appeal from the trial court’s December 1, 2014, order granting Gary and Nancy Vel-oric’s motion to compel discovery. After careful review, we quash.
The trial court summarized the factual and procedural history of this case as follows:
[Appellees] Gary Veloric and Nancy Veloric [ (“the Velorics”) ] filed the Doe Motion seeking a court order compelling [Appellants] John Doe and Jane Doe to appear for a deposition. After briefing and argument, the [trial court] granted the relief requested by [the Velorics] and ordered the Doe(s) to appear…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Schmerber v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Boyd v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
- Estelle v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Hoffman v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Lefkowitz v. TurleySupreme Court of the United States · 1973
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Ungurian, S. v. Beyzman, A., M.D.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2020
- Commonwealth v. DavisSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2017
- Est. of: Krappa, L. v. Lyons, M.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2019
- In Re: Steele v. Appeal of: Steele, V.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2017
- Leadbitter, J. v. Keystone Anesthesia v. PetragliaSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2020
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.