Legal Opinion

Verloic, G. v. Doe, J.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided September 14, 2015No. 121 EDA 2015PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION BY

SHOGAN, J.:

Appellants, John and/or Jane Doe, appeal from the trial court’s December 1, 2014, order granting Gary and Nancy Vel-oric’s motion to compel discovery. After careful review, we quash.

The trial court summarized the factual and procedural history of this case as follows:

[Appellees] Gary Veloric and Nancy Veloric [ (“the Velorics”) ] filed the Doe Motion seeking a court order compelling [Appellants] John Doe and Jane Doe to appear for a deposition. After briefing and argument, the [trial court] granted the relief requested by [the Velorics] and ordered the Doe(s) to appear…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Schmerber v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Boyd v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
  3. Estelle v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  4. Hoffman v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
  5. Lefkowitz v. TurleySupreme Court of the United States · 1973

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Ungurian, S. v. Beyzman, A., M.D.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2020
  2. Commonwealth v. DavisSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2017
  3. Est. of: Krappa, L. v. Lyons, M.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2019
  4. In Re: Steele v. Appeal of: Steele, V.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2017
  5. Leadbitter, J. v. Keystone Anesthesia v. PetragliaSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2020

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API