Legal Opinion
State v. Neal
Missouri Court of Appeals
Decided March 9, 1993No. WD 43803, WD 45904PublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SPINDEN, Judge.
Sam Guy Neal appeals his convictions as a prior offender of the Class C felonies of burglary in the second degree and stealing. He also appeals the court’s denial of his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief.
Neal asserts several points of error. He complains that the state’s evidence did not establish beyond a reasonable doubt that he participated in the burglary. He also assigns error to the court’s not permitting him to question a detective about fingerprints on the stolen merchandise; the state’s defining reasonable doubt and labeling him a “criminal” during closing…
2Cases cited37 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Payton v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Kimmelman v. MorrisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Minnesota v. OlsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Cage v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- State v. ClemonsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1997
- State v. KezerMissouri Court of Appeals · 1996
- CORNELIOUS v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2011
- State v. TivisMissouri Court of Appeals · 1996
- State v. MaddixMissouri Court of Appeals · 1996
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.