Legal Opinion

Reynolds v. Reynolds

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided May 20, 1927No. 26,017PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

'Stone, J.

In this action by the wife for the annulment of a marriage on the ground of fraud, a general demurrer to the complaint was sustained, and plaintiff appeals. Plaintiff and defendant, according to the complaint, were married “in form” at St. Cloud on July 7, 1924, which was less than six months from January 21,1924, on which date plaintiff avers defendant was divorced by the district court in Hen-nepin county from a former wife. If that is true, defendant was then subject to G-. S. 1923, § 8564, which provides that “No marriage shall be contracted while either of the parties has a…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Robertson v. RothSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1925
  2. Wemple v. WempleSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1927

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. In Re Estate of KinkeadSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1953
  2. Seeley v. ErringerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1953

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API