Legal Opinion

United States v. Ah Kee Eng, and Noh Kan Lee and Sing Fu Chen

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided February 20, 1957No. 34, Docket 23728PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LUMBARD, Circuit Judge.

As the proof at the trial was insufficient to support Ah Kee Eng’s conviction for conspiring with Noh Kan Lee and Sing Fu Chen to import and sell heroin in violation of 21 U.S.C.A. § 174, and because of the improper admission of evidence, and prejudicial error in the conduct of the trial judge, we must reverse the conviction.

Section 174 of Title 21 U.S.C.A. makes it unlawful to conspire to commit any of the acts set forth in the first part of the section which punishes anyone who “fraudulently or knowingly imports or brings any narcotic drug into the United States * *…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. United States v. Di ReSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
  2. Krulewitch v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
  3. Kwong Hai Chew v. ColdingSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
  4. Lutwak v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
  5. United States v. KochCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1940

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. State v. WadeOhio Supreme Court · 1978
  2. United States v. Joseph R. PisaniCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1985
  3. People v. ZackeryCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
  4. United States v. Albert GrunbergerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1970
  5. United States v. Joseph S. BukowskiCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1970

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API