Legal Opinion

Silbert v. Kerstein

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided July 3, 1945PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRonan, J.

This is an appeal from a final decree dismissing a bill in equity brought by the plaintiff, doing business under the name of “Emerson Fashions,” to restrain the defendants from doing business under the name of “Emerson’s Shoes” on the ground that they are unfairly competing with him.

The judge made a report of the material facts. The plaintiff challenges the correctness of many of those findings. We have a report of all the evidence, and all questions of law, fact and discretion are open for our decision. It is our duty to examine the evidence and reach our own conclusions, giving weight to…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Lowell Bar Ass'n v. LoebMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1943
  2. Kerwin v. DonaghyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1945
  3. Norton v. ChiodaMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1945
  4. Blair's Foodland Inc. v. Shuman's Foodland, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1942
  5. Jurewicz v. JurewiczMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1945

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Building Commissioner v. C. & H. Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1946
  2. Skil Corp. v. BarnetMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1958
  3. American Automobile Ins. Co. v. American Auto ClubCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1950
  4. The 88% STORES, INC. v. MartinezOregon Supreme Court · 1961
  5. 265 Tremont Street, Inc. v. HamilburgMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1947

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API