Legal Opinion

Huffaker v. McVey

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 14, 1917No. Civ. No. 2259PublishedCited by 4 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtLennon, P. J.

This appeal is from a judgment of dismissal of an action after refusal of the plaintiff and appellant to file a bond as required by the provisions of the libel and slander act.

The case, as presented in appellant’s briefs, does not contain sufficient printed extracts from the record to enable this court to determine the character of either the first or the amended complaint. “While the alternative method of appeal permits parties to file typewritten transcripts in lieu of printed judgment-rolls and bills of exceptions, such permission casts no burden upon the appellate courts to examine the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State v. NolanIdaho Supreme Court · 1917
  2. Beecham v. BurnsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1917
  3. California Savings & Commercial Bank v. CanneCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1917

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Fellows v. National Enquirer, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1986
  2. Grimes v. CarterCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1966
  3. Barker Brothers v. JoosCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1918
  4. Fellows v. National Enquirer, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API