Legal Opinion

Fellows v. National Enquirer, Inc.

California Supreme Court

Decided July 31, 1986No. L.A. 32082Published

1Opinion of the Court

42 Cal.3d 234 (1986)

721 P.2d 97

228 Cal. Rptr. 215

ARTHUR FELLOWS, Plaintiff and Appellant,

v.

NATIONAL ENQUIRER, INC., Defendant and Respondent.

Docket No. L.A. 32082.

Supreme Court of California.

July 31, 1986.

COUNSEL

Marvin Gross, James M. Simon and Grayson & Gross for Plaintiff and Appellant.

John G. Kester, Richard S. Hoffman, Williams & Connolly, Richard H. Borow, Jon W. Davidson and Irell & Manella for Defendant and Respondent.

OPINION

BROUSSARD, J.

Under Civil Code section 45a, language that is defamatory only by reference to extrinsic facts is not actionable unless the plaintiff can prove…

2Cases cited42 opinions

  1. New York Times Co. v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  2. Gertz v. Robert Welch, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
  3. National Ass'n for the Advancement of Colored People v. ButtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  4. Curtis Publishing Co. v. ButtsSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  5. Time, Inc. v. HillSupreme Court of the United States · 1967

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API