Jones v. Northern Trust Co.
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Action in the district court for Redwood county for the recovery of $6,000. At the trial the court, Webber, J., granted defendant’s-motion to dismiss on the ground that plaintiff had failed to establish a cause of action. From an order denying a motion for a new trial plaintiff appealed.
1Opinion of the Court
OOLLINS' J.
The court below, upon the trial of this action, sustained objections made to questions propounded by plaintiff’s counsel to his witnesses, and excluded testimony tending to prove plaintiff’s cause of action upon the ground that the latter had refused to-“furnish a bill of particulars of the amounts alleged to have been converted,” a demand for such, bill having been made under the provisions of G. S. 1894, § 5246; and the only question is as to the correctness of these rulings. We are clearly of the opinion that the court erred.
Section 5246 first appeared in this jurisdiction as…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Board of County Commissioners v. SmithSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1875
- Gebhard v. . ParkerNew York Court of Appeals · 1890
- Cunard v. FrancklynNew York Supreme Court · 1888
- Henry v. BrunsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1890
- Tuttle v. WilsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1889
3Cited by5 opinions
- Kramer v. GardnerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1908
- Burdick v. MannNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1931
- Board of County Commissioners v. American Loan & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1899
- Anderson v. M. Burg & Sons, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1927
- Davis v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1905