Legal Opinion
State v. Crook
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided May 26, 1992No. C6-91-2217PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
AMUNDSON, Judge.
This appeal is a certified question as to the constitutionality of a police officer’s removal of a baseball cap from a homicide suspect’s head without a prior pat-search of the cap and first having felt what was reasonably believed to be a weapon.
FACTS
On June 6, 1991, Minneapolis Police Officers Bautista and Beauchamp were on routine patrol when they saw a vehicle they believed to be wanted by the FBI in relation to a California homicide case. The officers had information that the homicide suspects were driving a dark blue Camaro with a Minnesota license plate, 947 FRY,…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- State v. DickersonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1992
- Wold v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
- State v. AlessoSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
- State v. FoxSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1969
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- State v. ValleCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2000
- State v. MirelesCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2000
- In Re the Welfare of M.D.R.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2005
- State v. IsidoreLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2001
- State v. VerscheldeCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1998
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.