Legal Opinion
In Re the Welfare of M.D.R.
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided March 22, 2005No. A04-831PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
CRIPPEN, Judge. *
Appellant M.D.R. challenges a district court order adjudicating him delinquent on a charge of possession of a firearm by an underage person in violation of Minn.Stat. § 624.713, subds. 1(a), (2) (Supp.2003), arguing that two Minneapolis police officers failed to show lawful cause either for stopping appellant or proceeding immediately to perform a safety pat-down search. Appellant was adjudicated delinquent based upon the discovery during the pat down that he possessed a pistol. Because the record does not show wrongful search conduct by the officers, we affirm.
FACTS
On…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- United States v. CortezSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Pennsylvania v. MimmsSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Minnesota v. DickersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- State v. HarrisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1999
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- State v. KlamarCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2012
- State v. LemertCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2013
- Neil Douglas Rollins v. Commissioner of Public SafetyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2014