Analytichem International, Inc. v. Har-Len Associates., Inc.
District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
DUMBAULD, Senior District Judge.
Before us for disposition are two motions unconnected with the validity of the patent involved in the case or its infringement: (1) motion by plaintiff * to strike under Rule 12(f) FRCP as an “insufficient defense” defendant’s first affirmative defense (unclean hands); and (2) motion by defendant under Rule 56 FRCP for summary judgment upon the ground of patent misuse.
Apparently it is not disputed that plaintiff’s motion is untimely under Rule 12(f), but we shall examine the merits of whether it should be granted because the proffered affirmative defense…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Keystone Driller Co. v. General Excavator Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1933
- Mercoid Corp. v. Mid-Continent Investment Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Morton Salt Co. v. G. S. Suppiger Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1942
- International Business MacHines Corp. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1936
- United States v. Jerrold Electronics CorporationDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1960
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Amgen, Inc. v. Chugai Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1989
- Federal Laboratories, Inc. v. Barringer Research, Ltd.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1981