Murphy v. Murphy

Opinion by

Keller, J.,

The confused state of this record is due to a failure to comply with the equity rules in force at the time. (Rules of January 15,1894 — -159 Pa. xxv — October 5, 1900, and July 6, 1911.)

Following the action of the Supreme Court in this case (263 Pa. 196), the court below appointed A. C. Johnston “Examiner or Master to state an account,” although the office of examiner to take testimony had been expressly discontinued by Rule 59, except in proceedings conducted under the directions of a statute by which duties were imposed upon an examiner. He should have been appointed…