Andrews v. Mines Corp.
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
1Opinion of the CourtKnowlton, C. J.
This is a petition for a writ of mandamus upon which a justice of this court,* after a hearing, entered an order that the writ should issue, and then, at the request of the respondents, reported the case to this court. As the proceeding is at law, such a report brings before us only questions of law, and the decision of the single justice must be given effect unless some error of law appears.
The petitioner is a stockholder in the respondent corporation, and his petition is that the corporation and the other respondent, *122who is a director and the treasurer of the corporation, having custody of…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Dunphy v. Traveller Newspaper Ass'nMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1888
- Post & Co. v. Toledo, Cincinnati, & St. Louis RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1887
- Kimball v. St. Louis & San Francisco Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1892
- Varney v. BakerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1907
- Kansas & Eastern Railroad Construction Co. v. Topeka, Salina & Western RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1883
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Travis v. . Knox Terpezone Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1915
- Lydia E. Pinkham Medicine Co. v. GoveMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1937
- People Ex Rel. Solomon v. Brotherhood of Painters, Decorators & Paperhangers of AmericaNew York Court of Appeals · 1916
- Sauerbrunn v. . Hartford Life Ins. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1917
- Machen v. Machen & Mayer Electrical Mfg. Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1912
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.