Legal Opinion

Andrews v. Mines Corp.

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided February 23, 1910PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKnowlton, C. J.

This is a petition for a writ of mandamus upon which a justice of this court,* after a hearing, entered an order that the writ should issue, and then, at the request of the respondents, reported the case to this court. As the proceeding is at law, such a report brings before us only questions of law, and the decision of the single justice must be given effect unless some error of law appears.

The petitioner is a stockholder in the respondent corporation, and his petition is that the corporation and the other respondent, *122who is a director and the treasurer of the corporation, having custody of…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Dunphy v. Traveller Newspaper Ass'nMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1888
  2. Post & Co. v. Toledo, Cincinnati, & St. Louis RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1887
  3. Kimball v. St. Louis & San Francisco Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1892
  4. Varney v. BakerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1907
  5. Kansas & Eastern Railroad Construction Co. v. Topeka, Salina & Western RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1883

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Travis v. . Knox Terpezone Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1915
  2. Lydia E. Pinkham Medicine Co. v. GoveMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1937
  3. People Ex Rel. Solomon v. Brotherhood of Painters, Decorators & Paperhangers of AmericaNew York Court of Appeals · 1916
  4. Sauerbrunn v. . Hartford Life Ins. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1917
  5. Machen v. Machen & Mayer Electrical Mfg. Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1912

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API