Legal Opinion
Miller v. General Outdoor Advertising Co.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided December 2, 1963PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WYATT, District Judge.
This is a motion by defendant Gamble:Skogmo, Ine. (“Gamble”) for summary .judgment (Fed.R.Civ.P. 56) in an action for alleged “short swing” profits under :Section 16(b) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. § 78p(b); •the “Act”).
The “issuer” is Alleghany Corporation ; the action is brought in its behalf by a stockholder and Alleghany is named .as a defendant. Jurisdiction is given to this Court by Section 27 of the Act (15 U.S.C. § 78aa).
Alleghany is a Maryland corporation ■which has outstanding about 9,800,000 ■shares of common stock; this stock is…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Bertha Silverman v. Alfons Landa, and Fruehauf Trailer CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1962
- Entel v. GuildenDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1963
3Cited by8 opinions
- Miller v. General Outdoor Advertising Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1964
- Board Of Trade Of The City Of Chicago v. Securities And Exchange CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1982
- In Re Daig Corporation, Debtor. Merrimac Associates, Inc. v. Daig CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1986
- Gandal v. Telemundo Group, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 1992
- Verrey v. EllsworthDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1969
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.