Legal Opinion

40 Associates, Inc. v. Katz

Civil Court of the City of New York

Decided July 27, 1981PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Stanley H. Nason, J.

Petitioner moves to sever the respondent’s counterclaims. The lease, which relates to commercial premises, provides a waiver of the right to interpose counterclaims in summary proceedings.

A lease provision waiving the right to interpose counterclaims in summary proceedings is valid (Rasch, New York Landlord and Tenant [2d ed], § 1328). However, the waiver will not be applied to counterclaims for breach of warranty of habitability (Cosmopolitan Assoc. v Ortega, 90 Misc 2d 437) nor to those which logically apply in a summary proceeding.

The history of the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Park West Management Corp. v. MitchellNew York Court of Appeals · 1979
  2. Cosmopolitan Associates v. OrtegaCivil Court of the City of New York · 1977

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Davidow v. Inwood North Professional Group—Phase ITexas Supreme Court · 1988
  2. Glen 6 Associates, Inc. v. DedajDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1991
  3. All 4 Sports & Fitness, Inc. v. Hamilton, Kane, Martin Enterprises, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API