Legal Opinion

Groneweg & Schmoentgen Co. v. Estes

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided May 25, 1909PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal from the Christian Circuit Court. — Eon. John T. Moore, Judge. This case originated before a justice of the peace and for that reason a demurrer is never allowable in it at any stage of the proceedings either before the justice or in an appellate court. Wendleton v. Kingrey, 110 Mo. App. 69; R. S. 1899, sec. 591; Lumber Co. v. Schuler & Muench, 59 Mo. App. 97; Martin v. Creech, 58 Mo. App. 393; Kane v. Dauernheim, 51 Mo.

Read the full summary

Appeal from the Christian Circuit Court. — Eon. John T. Moore, Judge. This case originated before a justice of the peace and for that reason a demurrer is never allowable in it at any stage of the proceedings either before the justice or in an appellate court. Wendleton v. Kingrey, 110 Mo. App. 69; R. S. 1899, sec. 591; Lumber Co. v. Schuler & Muench, 59 Mo. App. 97; Martin v. Creech, 58 Mo. App. 393; Kane v. Dauernheim, 51 Mo. App. 636. Compliance with the laws of the State will be presumed and failure to comply is purely a matter of defense. Shoe Machinery Co. v. Ramlose, 210 Mo. 649;…

1Opinion of the Court

GOODE, J. —

Plaintiff filed a statement before a justice of tbe peace, averring it was a corporation doing business under tbe laws of tbe State of Iowa, and a resident of Council Bluffs in said State; that defendant, a resident of Christian county, Missouri, on August 8, 1905, sold plaintiff three hundred cases of tomatoes, undertaking and agreeing to deliver them on board cars at Billings, Missouri, for the price of seventy-five cents per dozen cans, less one and one-half per cent of the invoice price, payable on arrival and inspection of the goods; that plaintiff at all times thereafter…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. United Shoe Machinery Co. v. RamloseSupreme Court of Missouri · 1908
  2. Parlin & Orendorff Co. v. BoatmanMissouri Court of Appeals · 1900
  3. Theobald v. Supreme Lodge, Knights of Pythias of the WorldMissouri Court of Appeals · 1894
  4. Wendleton v. KingeryMissouri Court of Appeals · 1904
  5. Martin v. CreechMissouri Court of Appeals · 1894

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Moon v. MartinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921
  2. C. G. Conn Co. v. OrrMissouri Court of Appeals · 1910
  3. Mergenthaler Linotype Co. v. HaysMissouri Court of Appeals · 1914
  4. Gulf, C. & S. F. Ry. Co. v. SullivanCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1916

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API