Heck v. Voelkle
New York Supreme Court
Action on contract.
1Opinion of the CourtRodenbeck, J.
This action is brought to recover upon a contract made between the parties which plaintiff claims is a partnership agreement and defendant claims is an employment agreement. The contract is in writing and provides among other things that the ‘ ‘ party of the first part [defendant] agrees to employ, and does hereby employ the party of the second part *693[plaintiff] to take charge of the restaurant part of said business and to attend to all the details of cooking, preparing and serving meals and lunches in the said business ’ ’ and 1‘ as the agent of the party of the first part to make all…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Richardson v. . HughittNew York Court of Appeals · 1879
- Cassidy v. . HallNew York Court of Appeals · 1884
- Smith v. . BodineNew York Court of Appeals · 1878
- Magovern v. . RobertsonNew York Court of Appeals · 1889
- Lee v. WashburnAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1903
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Smith v. MaineNew York Supreme Court · 1932
- Kilgore v. the Farmers Union Oil Co. of EppingNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1946