Legal Opinion
Congoleum Industries, Inc. v. Armstrong Cork Company
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided October 5, 1973No. Civ. A. 41762PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
HANNUM, District Judge.
On February 23, 1972, this Court held that the United States patents in suit, assigned to the plaintiff, Congoleum Industries, Inc. (Congoleum), were valid and infringed by the defendant, Armstrong Cork Company (Armstrong). 1 Presently before the Court is Defendant’s Motion Under Rule 60(b)(2), Fed.R.Civ.P. to Reopen the Record to allow the defendant to present newly discovered evidence that its accused product and process do not infringe the patents in suit.
The patents in suit and the accused product and process are concerned with the art of…
2Cases cited55 opinions
- United States v. Socony-Vacuum Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Northern Pacific Railway Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. Stiffel Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Lear, Inc. v. AdkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- United States v. Arnold, Schwinn & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1967
50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Usm Corporation v. Sps Technologies, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1982
- Atlas Chemical Industries, Inc., Cross-Appellee v. Moraine Products, Cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1974
- Mannington Mills, Inc. v. Congoleum Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1979
- Congoleum Industries, Inc. v. Armstrong Cork CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1975
- Pittway v. Black & DeckerDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1987
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.