Legal Opinion
Yap v. Motor Vehicle Accident Indemnification Corp.
New York Supreme Court
Decided July 2, 1963PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtAnthony M. Livoti, J.
This is an application pursuant to section 618 of the New York State Insurance Law for an order permitting the petitioner to sue the Motor Vehicle Accident Indemnification Corporation.
The petitioner allegedly was injured by a “ hit and run” vehicle. He asserts, and respondent does not deny, that he has complied with the notice requirements of the statute; that he was not at the time of the accident operating an uninsured motor vehicle or operating a motor vehicle in violation of an order of suspension or revocation; that he has a cause of action against the operator or owner of a “ hit and…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Douglas v. New York, New Haven & Hartford RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1929
- Bump v. New York, New Haven & Hartford RailroadAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1899
- In re the Probate of the Last Will & Testament of GahnNew York Surrogate's Court · 1920
- Scoe Corp. v. Paramount Pictures Corp.New York Supreme Court · 1959
- In re the Estate of RotholzNew York Surrogate's Court · 1937
3Cited by5 opinions
- Wyoming Insurance Guaranty Ass'n v. WoodsWyoming Supreme Court · 1994
- Black v. De BlackWyoming Supreme Court · 2000
- Ortman v. MillerMichigan Court of Appeals · 1971
- Am. Nat'l Prop. v. BurnsCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2019
- In the Matter of the Estate of Neal E. Tokowitz a/k/a Neal Edward Tokowitz, deceased: James Silverwood, Personal Representative of the Estate of Neal E. Tokowitz and Randy Green, Trustee of the Residual Trust Established for Carol Tokowitz v. Carol TokowitzWyoming Supreme Court · 2024