Legal Opinion

Scoe Corp. v. Paramount Pictures Corp.

New York Supreme Court

Decided February 19, 1959PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAron Steuer, J.

Defendant appears specially and moves to vacate the service of the summons by substituted service. Defendant is a resident of Switzerland. He came to New York on June 9, 1958, accompanying his wife. The occasion of the visit was the filming of a motion picture in which defendant’s *193wife was acting. The couple stayed at a hotel from June 9 to June 23, 1958. They then sublet an apartment which they occupied until August 16, 1958. Application for substituted service and the granting of the order both took place while the defendant was in this city.

Section 230 of the Civil Practice Act allows…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Washington v. ThomasAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1905

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Yap v. Motor Vehicle Accident Indemnification Corp.New York Supreme Court · 1963
  2. Young v. YoungNew York Supreme Court · 1960

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API