People v. Long
New York Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorándum.
The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed. Supreme Court properly denied defendant’s motion for a Mapp/Dunaway hearing in light of defendant’s failure to raise a factual dispute as to reasonable suspicion for her detention and subsequent arrest. “[T]he sufficiency of defendant’s factual allegations should be evaluated by (1) the face of the pleadings, (2) assessed in conjunction with the context of the motion, and (3) defendant’s access to information” (People v Mendoza, 82 NY2d 415, 426 [1993]; see also People v Lopez, 5 NY3d 753, 754 [2005]).…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- People v. MendozaNew York Court of Appeals · 1993
- People v. BryantNew York Court of Appeals · 2007
- People v. LopezNew York Court of Appeals · 2005
3Cited by18 opinions
- People v. HaskinsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
- People v. JonesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
- People v. SpringsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
- People v. ChandlerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
- People v. MattocksAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.