Legal Opinion

People v. Lopez

New York Court of Appeals

Decided June 30, 2005PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed.

The suppression court did not commit reversible error in denying the Mapp/Dunaway portion of defendant’s suppression motion without a hearing. Given “(1) the face of the pleadings, (2) assessed in conjunction with the context of the motion, and (3) defendant’s access to information,” defendant’s allegations in support of his motion were too conclusory to warrant a hearing (People v Mendoza, 82 NY2d 415, 426 [1993]; see also People v Jones, 95 NY2d 721, 728-729 [2001]). Defendant gave a written postarrest…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. People v. MendozaNew York Court of Appeals · 1993
  2. People v. JonesNew York Court of Appeals · 2001

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. People v. BakerxAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
  2. People v. LongNew York Court of Appeals · 2007
  3. People v. GilmoreAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
  4. People v. LongAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
  5. People v. ArokiumAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API