Legal Opinion

Phila. Auto Finance Co. v. Agricultural Ins.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 10, 1930No. Appeal 179PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Baldrige, J.,

This is an action in assumpsit on a theft insurance policy covering an automobile. The case came on for trial before a judge sitting without -a jury, and a verdict was rendered in favor of the plaintiff; hence, this appeal.

The plaintiff company is engaged in the business of financing automobiles, and, in the course of its business, leased an automobile to Harry L. Tiefenbrun. It applied' for, and obtained from, Henry A; Lewis, Inc., a policy of insurance, dated March 4, 1927, in the defendant company. The policy was issued in the name of Harry L. Tiefenbrun and…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Fedas v. Insurance Co. of PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1930
  2. Gould v. Dwelling-House Ins.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1890
  3. Kunkel v. KunkelSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1920
  4. Ruth-Hastings Glass Tube Co. v. SlatterySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1920
  5. Simons v. Safety Mutual Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1923

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Arlotte v. National Liberty InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1933
  2. ACF Produce, Inc. v. Chubb/Pacific Indemnity GroupDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1978
  3. Bobereski, Adm. v. Ins. Co. of Pa.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1932
  4. Tibbetts v. Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1933
  5. American Credit Indemnity Co. of New York v. W. K. Mitchell & Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1935

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API