Legal Opinion

United States v. Pembrook

District Court, E.D. Michigan

Decided July 31, 2015No. Case No. 2:14-cr-20525PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER DENYING MOTION TO SUPPRESS CELL SITE LOCATION INFORMATION [56] AND GRANTING IN PART . MOTION TO EXCLUDE OR LIMIT EXPERT TESTIMONY [53]

LAURIE J. MICHELSON, District Judge’.

On April 22, 2014, four men attempted to rob a jewelry store in Grand Rapids, Michigan,, but, ■ after one was shot by a store owner, they fled without merchan*579dise. Later that same day, three men stole $1,500,000 in Rolex watches from a jewelry store in West Bloomfield, Michigan. Defendants Nathaniel Pembrook, David Briley, Shaeed Calhoun, and Orlando Johnson are charged with multiple criminal offenses…

2Cases cited38 opinions

  1. Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
  2. Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. Alderman v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  4. Smith v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  5. Kyllo v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2001

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State of West Virginia v. Tulsa JohnsonWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2017
  2. v. ShanksColorado Court of Appeals · 2019
  3. State v. ConnerCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2020
  4. United States v. Shaeed CalhounCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API