Legal Opinion

Gross v. Bunker Hill & Sullivan Mining & Concentrating Co.

District Court, D. Idaho

Decided November 18, 1930No. Nos. 1030, 1033PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CAYANAH, District Judge.

As tho motions in each case of the defendants for judgment of dismissal on the pleadings were presented at the same time, and present the same questions, they will, as requested, be disposed of together. The cases <ne at issue, as answers were Bled in each of them setting up the execution of an instrument by the owners of the premises, as parties of the first, part, and the defendants Bunker Hill & Sullivan Mining & Concentrating Company, the Federal Mining & Smelting Company, the Hecla Mining Company, and parties other than the defendants Sunshine Mining Company and…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Luama v. Bunker Hill & Sullivan Mining & Concentrating Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1930
  2. Schwab v. Smuggler-Union Mining Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1909

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Coeur D'Alene Tribe v. Asarco Inc.District Court, D. Idaho · 2003
  2. Daniels v. Bethlehem Mines Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1958

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API