Legal Opinion

Luama v. Bunker Hill & Sullivan Mining & Concentrating Co.

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided June 16, 1930No. 6109PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WILBUR, Circuit Judge.

This is an action brought by the appellant to recover for damages done to his real estate and live stock by the deposit on his land by the flood waters of the Coeur d’Alene river of tailings and debris resulting from the mining operations of the appellees in the Coeur d’Alene Mining District in Shoshone county, state of Idaho. It is alleged that these tailings are deposited in or near the South fork of the Coeur d’Alene river, and were deposited upon the plaintiff’s land by the high water of the Coeur d’Alene river overflowing the banks of said river spreading over the…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Woodruff v. North Bloomfield Gravel Mining Co.United States Circuit Court · 1884
  2. Arizona Copper Co. v. GillespieSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
  3. McCarthy v. Bunker Hill & Sullivan Mining & Concentrating Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1908
  4. Hill v. SmithCalifornia Supreme Court · 1865
  5. Hobbs v. Amador & Sacramento Canal Co.California Supreme Court · 1884

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Melvin Griffeth and Lois D. Griffeth v. Utah Power & Light Company, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1955
  2. Coeur D'Alene Tribe v. Asarco Inc.District Court, D. Idaho · 2003
  3. United States v. FixicoCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1940
  4. Daniels v. Bethlehem Mines Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1958
  5. Westward Co. v. Gem Products, Inc.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 1983

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API