Legal Opinion

Mitchell v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided May 27, 1994No. 1930736PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HOUSTON, Justice.

The plaintiff, Myron Mitchell, appeals from a summary judgment for the defendant, State Farm Fire and Casualty Company (“State Farm”), in this third-party action to recover damages based on allegations of breach of contract, bad faith refusal to pay an insurance claim, and fraud. We affirm.

Our standard for reviewing summary judgments has been stated many times. The judgment in this case was proper if there was no genuine issue of material fact and State Farm was entitled to a judgment as a matter of law. Rule 56, Ala.R.Civ.P. The burden was on State Farm to make a prima facie…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Thomas v. Principal Financial GroupSupreme Court of Alabama · 1990
  2. Principal Financial Group v. ThomasSupreme Court of Alabama · 1991
  3. Mixon v. Houston CountySupreme Court of Alabama · 1992
  4. Principal Financial Group v. ThomasSupreme Court of the United States · 1991

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Dunn v. American Family InsuranceColorado Court of Appeals · 2010
  2. Engel v. Liberty Insurance CorporationDistrict Court, S.D. Alabama · 2022
  3. Smith v. Cotton States Mutual Insurance Co.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API