Simson v. Klipstein
New Jersey Court of Chancery
On bill. On motion'to strike out bill.
1Opinion of the Court
Lane, V. C.
The bill in this case was filed to compel specific performance of a contract of sale. The contract is not under seal. It purports to be between the Midvale Chemical Works, an association, as party of the first part, and Ernest C. Klipstein, as party of the second part. It is signed for the party of the first part, Mid-vale Chemical Works, by George W. Hunter and Leslie N. Simson' trustees. • The suit is brought by Leslie N. Simson and George W. Hunter, and while in the opening paragraph of the bill they are not termed “trustees,” yet by a perusal of the whole bill it is perfectly…
2Cited by5 opinions
- Simson v. KlipsteinDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1920
- Baldwin v. Van VorstSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1856
- Hayes v. StigerNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1878
- Avon-by-the-Sea Land & Improvement Co. v. FinnSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1898
- Holmes v. SteeleNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1877