Simson v. Klipstein
District Court, D. New Jersey
At Law. Action by Leslie N. Simson and George W. Hunter, trustees, against Ernest C. Klipstein. On motion to dismiss for want of jurisdiction.
1Opinion of the Court
DAVIS} District Judge.
Defendant in the above-stated cause mov-r ed to dismiss the same on the ground that this court is without jurisdiction because one of the necessary parties plaintiff and the defendant are both citizens of the state of New Jersey. The defendant further asks permission to take testimony to establish the citizenship of the said necessary party and for an order adding the name of said party plaintiff to the complaint.
[1] On March 15, 1916, the plaintiffs, Simson and Hunter, by an instrument purporting to be a declaration of trust, called “Articles of Association of Midvale…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Williams v. Inhabitants of MiltonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1913
- New Orleans v. Gaines's AdministratorSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
- Mexican Central Railway Co. v. EckmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1903
- Gleason v. McKayMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1883
- Phillips v. BlatchfordMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1884
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- McCamey v. Hollister Oil Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1922
- In re Sargent Lumber Co.District Court, E.D. Arkansas · 1923
- Douglass v. Safe Deposit & Trust Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1930
- Levy v. NellisAppellate Court of Illinois · 1936
- Navarro Savings Assn. v. LeeSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.