Pina v. Christensen
Wyoming Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
GOLDEN, Justice.
[T1] Theresa and Juan Pifia brought an action against Dr. Charles Christensen for medical malpractice. After a jury trial, the jury found no negligence on the part of Dr. Christensen. The Pifias appeal, arguing the jury instructions misled the jury as to the appropriate standard of care. Finding no error in the jury instructions, we affirm.
ISSUE
[T2] The Pifias present the issue in this case as whether the trial court prejudicially erred when it instructed the jury: "Before you may find that [Dr. Christensen] was negligent in his care and treatment of [Mrs. Pifial, you must…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. ShraderWyoming Supreme Court · 1994
- Cervelli v. GravesWyoming Supreme Court · 1983
- Bigley v. CravenWyoming Supreme Court · 1989
- Kemper Architects, P.C. v. McFall, Konkel & Kimball Consulting Engineers, Inc.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1992
- Three Way, Inc. v. Burton Enterprises, Inc.Wyoming Supreme Court · 2008
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Thierfelder v. WolfertSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2012
- Glenn v. Union Pacific RailroadWyoming Supreme Court · 2011
- Merit Energy Company, LLC v. Blake HorrWyoming Supreme Court · 2016
- Black Diamond Energy, Inc., a Delaware Corporation v. Encana Oil and Gas (Usa) Inc., a Delaware CorporationWyoming Supreme Court · 2014
- Jessy Michael Dennis v. The State of WyomingWyoming Supreme Court · 2013
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.