Legal Opinion · Dissent

Lehigh Portland Cement Co. v. New York State Department of Environmental Conservation

New York Court of Appeals

Decided December 5, 1995Published

1DissentBellacosa, J.

We would affirm the Appellate Division order affirming the dismissal of the complaint seeking declaratory judgment. The key question is whether plaintiff-appellant Lehigh exhausted its administrative remedies before pursuing judicial relief. That issue turns on whether the so-called futility exception to the doctrine of the exhaustion of administrative remedies applies in this case. We agree with both lower courts that the exhaustion of remedies principle, not its exception, should control.

Lehigh wished to secure a Beneficial Use Determination (BUD) under ECL article 70 and 6 NYCRR part 621.…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Myers v. Bethlehem Shipbuilding Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Watergate II Apartments v. Buffalo Sewer AuthorityNew York Court of Appeals · 1978
  3. Bethesda Hospital Assn. v. BowenSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  4. Young Men's Christian Ass'n v. Rochester Pure Waters DistrictNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
  5. Grattan v. Department of Social ServicesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API