Legal Opinion

Sentinel Management Co. v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided August 17, 2000No. C2-98-2304, CX-98-2373PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BLATZ, Chief Justice.

Defendant-appellant New Hampshire Insurance Company brings this appeal contending that the district court abused its discretion in admitting expert testimony on asbestos contamination that New Hampshire claims should have been excluded under Minnesota’s evidentiary standard for scientific testimony. In addition, New Hampshire claims that even if the expert’s testimony was properly admitted, the evidence still does not support the jury’s finding that there was a direct physical loss to plaintiff-respondent Kellogg Square Partnership (KSP), which invoked coverage…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Frye v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1923
  2. State Ex Rel. Cooper v. FrenchSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1990
  3. DLH, Inc. v. RussSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1997
  4. Prudential-LMI Commercial Insurance v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
  5. Sentinel Management Co. v. New Hampshire Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1997

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Appalachian Insurance Company v. Affiliated Fm Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2002
  2. Motorsports Racing Plus, Inc. v. Arctic Cat Sales, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2003
  3. Joseph Friedberg v. Chubb & Son, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2012
  4. Doe v. Archdiocese of Saint Paul & MinneapolisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2012
  5. Home Insurance Co. v. National Union Fire Insurance of PittsburghSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2003

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API